针刺联合推拿治疗肩胛提肌损伤型落枕的临床疗效：随机对照试验

李波; 黄麦玲; 尚希钰; 董雨萌; 曹玉清; 张磊; 梁博文; 赵丽萍; 罗敬月; 陈广坤; 马艳

doi:10.13703/j.0255-2930.20231206-k0007

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

针刺联合推拿治疗肩胛提肌损伤型落枕的临床疗效：随机对照试验

临床研究 | 更新时间：2024-06-14

- 针刺联合推拿治疗肩胛提肌损伤型落枕的临床疗效：随机对照试验
- Acupuncture combined with tuina therapy for stiff neck with levator scapula injury type: a randomized controlled trial
- 中国针灸 2024年44卷第6期页码：637-642
- 作者机构：
  
  1.首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院/北京市结核病胸部肿瘤研究所，北京　101149
  2.中国中医科学院中医临床基础医学研究所，北京　100700
  3.中国中医科学院中医药信息研究所，北京　100700
- 作者简介：
  
  ☒陈广坤，副研究员。E-mail：chenguangkun2008@126.com
- 基金信息：
  
  首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院种子计划项目(gz-202105);北京市属医院科研培育计划项目(PZ2023030);国家自然科学基金资助项目(82274350;82305440);中国中医科学院科技创新工程项目(CI2021A00704;CI2021A01314;CI2021B003)
- DOI：10.13703/j.0255-2930.20231206-k0007
  中图分类号：
- 收稿：2023-12-06，
  
  网络首发：2024-04-02，
  
  纸质出版：2024-06-12
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李波, 黄麦玲, 尚希钰, 等. 针刺联合推拿治疗肩胛提肌损伤型落枕的临床疗效：随机对照试验[J]. 中国针灸, 2024,44(6):637-642.

LI Bo, HUANG Mailing, SHANG Xiyu, et al. Acupuncture combined with tuina therapy for stiff neck with levator scapula injury type: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion, 2024, 44(6): 637-642. DOI: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20231206-k0007.
李波, 黄麦玲, 尚希钰, 等. 针刺联合推拿治疗肩胛提肌损伤型落枕的临床疗效：随机对照试验[J]. 中国针灸, 2024,44(6):637-642. DOI： 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20231206-k0007.

LI Bo, HUANG Mailing, SHANG Xiyu, et al. Acupuncture combined with tuina therapy for stiff neck with levator scapula injury type: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion, 2024, 44(6): 637-642. DOI: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20231206-k0007. DOI：

摘要

目的：

观察针刺联合推拿治疗肩胛提肌损伤型落枕的临床疗效。

方法：

将162例肩胛提肌型落枕患者随机分为针刺联合推拿组（针推联合组，52例）、推拿组（55例）和针刺组（55例）。针刺组予针刺患侧后溪，由后溪向劳宫方向刺入10~20 mm，予以强刺激或中强刺激手法，行针过程中患者活动颈肩部及上肢，留针2~3 min；推拿组予以压痛点强刺激按压手法松解肩胛提肌起止点的改良手法；针推联合组先予推拿治疗，结束后立即行针刺后溪治疗。各组均隔日治疗1次，共治疗3次。治疗前及治疗第1、3、7天，观察各组患者头颈肩部简式McGill疼痛问卷量表（SF-MPQ）评分[包括疼痛评估指数（PRI）、疼痛视觉模拟量表（VAS）、现时疼痛强度（PPI）评分3部分]、颈椎活动度评分，并评定各组临床疗效及安全性。

结果：

治疗第1、3、7天后，各组患者头颈肩部SF-MPQ、PRI、VAS、PPI评分较治疗前降低（

0.01）。治疗第1、3天后，针推联合组以上评分均低于推拿组及针刺组（

0.05，

0.01）；治疗第7天后，针推联合组以上评分均低于针刺组（

0.01）。治疗第3天后，推拿组SF-MPQ、PRI、VAS评分低于针刺组（

0.01）；治疗第7天后，推拿组SF-MPQ、PRI、VAS、PPI评分均低于针刺组（

0.01，

0.05）。治疗第1、3、7天后，各组患者颈椎活动度评分均较治疗前降低（

0.01）；治疗第3天后，针推联合组颈椎

活动度评分低于针刺组及推拿组（

0.01）。治疗第1、3、7天后，针推联合组治愈率均高于推拿组及针刺组（

0.01）。治疗期间，各组均未发生严重不良反应。

结论：

针刺联合推拿治疗可有效改善肩胛提肌损伤型落枕，缓解患者疼痛，恢复颈椎活动度，且临床疗效优于单纯推拿和针刺治疗。

Abstract

Objective

To observe the clinical efficacy of acupuncture combined with

tuina

therapy for stiff neck with levator scapula injury type.

Methods

A total of 162 patients with stiff neck of levator scapula injury type were randomly divided into an acupuncture combined with tuina group (combined group

52 patients)

a tuina group (55 patients)

and an acupuncture group (55 patients). The patients in the acupuncture group received acupuncture on the affected side's Houxi (SI 3)

inserting the needle 10 to 20 mm towards Laogong (PC 8) with strong or moderate stimulation

and patients were instructed to move their neck

shoulders

and upper limbs during the process

with the needle retained for 2 to 3 min. The patients in the tuina group received strong stimulation pressing on tender points to release the starting and ending points of the trapezius muscle with modified techniques. The combined group first received

tuina

therapy

followed immediately by acupuncture treatment at the Houxi (SI 3). Treatments were administered every other day for a total of three sessions. Before treatment and on 1

and 7 days after treatment

the simple McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) scores [including the pain rating index (PRI)

visual analogue scale (VAS)

and present pain intensity (PPI) scores

]

of the head

neck and shoulder

cervical spine mobility scores were observed

and the clinical efficacy and safety of each group were evaluated.

Results

On the 1

and 7 days after treatment

the SF-MPQ

PRI

VAS

and PPI scores of the head

neck

and shoulder in all groups were significantly reduced (

0.01). On the 1

and 3 days after treatment

the above scores in the combined group were lower than those in the tuina group and the acupuncture group (

0.05

0.01). On the 7 days after treatment

the above scores in the combined group were lower than those in the acupuncture group (

0.01). On the 3 days after treatment

the SF-MPQ

PRI

and VAS scores in the tuina group were lower than those in the acupuncture group (

0.01). On the 7 days after treatment

the SF-MPQ

PRI

VAS

and PPI scores in the tuina group were lower than those in the acupuncture group (

0.01

0.05). On the 1

and 7 days after treatment

the cervical spine mobility scores in each group were decreased compared to those before treatment (

0.01). On the 3 days after treatment

the cervical spine mobility score in the combined group was lower than that in the acupuncture group and the tuina group (

0.01). On the 1

and 7 days after treatment

the cured rate in the combined group was higher than that in the tuina group and the acupuncture group (

0.01). During the treatment period

no serious adverse reactions occurred in any group.

Conclusion

Acupuncture combined with

tuina

therapy could effectively improve stiff neck with levator scapula injury type

alleviate patient pain

restore cervical spine mobility

and clinically outperform both

tuina

and acupuncture therapy alone.

关键词

Keywords

references

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

“升清降浊”法针刺治疗脓毒症胃肠功能障碍：随机对照试验

火针治疗膝骨关节炎的远期临床疗效观察

基于“肺与大肠相表里”理论针刺对支气管哮喘急性发作期的影响

不同频率捻转手法针刺廉泉治疗缺血性卒中后失语的临床量效研究

针刺治疗慢性荨麻疹随机对照试验的结局指标现状分析