LUO Zhen, GANG Weijuan, HU Xiaoyi, et al. Evidence gap between the systematic reviews and clinical concerns in acupuncture and moxibustion for frozen shoulder[J]. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion, 2025, 45(11): 1673-1680.
LUO Zhen, GANG Weijuan, HU Xiaoyi, et al. Evidence gap between the systematic reviews and clinical concerns in acupuncture and moxibustion for frozen shoulder[J]. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion, 2025, 45(11): 1673-1680.DOI: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20250318-k0003.
To reveal the gap between the evidence of systematic reviews (SRs) and clinical concerns by systematically summarizing the evidence on acupuncture and moxibustion for frozen shoulder and investigating the concerns and needs of clinicians in treatment with acupuncture and moxibustion for this disease.
Methods
2
The articles of SR and Meta-analysis on acupuncture and moxibustion for frozen shoulder were searched from CNKI
Wanfang
VIP
SinoMed
PubMed
EMbase and Cochrane Library
starting from the inception of each database up to December 31st
2022. Two researchers screened the articles and extracted data independently. Using AMSTAR-2
the methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated. Based on systematic reviews and expert discussion
a questionnaire on clinical concerns of acupuncture and moxibustion for frozen shoulder was developed and distributed to clinicians. The discrepancies between the evidence and clinical concerns were compared from 5 dimensions
including population
interventions
control measures
outcome indicators and review time points.
Results
2
The evidence gaps existed between SRs and clinical concerns. In the existing studies
the needs of personalized treatment were not fully considered in terms of different syndromes/patterns of frozen shoulder and stages of illness
the outcome indicators were not employed properly
the time for outcome measurement was vague
the control groups were set up outside of standardization
and the methodological quality was lower.
Conclusion
2
It is suggested that future studies should improve the quality of methodology
lay more consideration to different patient groups
optimize outcome indicators and standardize the setting of control groups
so as to better meet the needs of patients and achieve the best match between evidence and clinicians' needs.